1. Home
  2. Applications
  3. Legionella in the cooling tower

Voigtländer · Cooling water

Control and document Legionella in cooling towers

Voigtländer generates anolyte on site and doses it into the cooling circuit under measurement control; operating data is stored. This supports Legionella control and documentation in cooling towers. The service is for operators of industrial evaporative cooling systems and for facility management and building services. Treatment does not replace the operator's duties under the 42. BImSchV (German ordinance on evaporative cooling systems, cooling towers and wet separators), and which inspections, intervals and values apply depends on the plant type.

Operator duties under the 42. BImSchV

First question: which plant type applies in law?

The 42. BImSchV (German ordinance on evaporative cooling systems, cooling towers and wet separators) distinguishes evaporative cooling systems, wet separators and the legally defined category of cooling towers. Inspections, intervals and reference values depend on this classification. There is no blanket monthly or quarterly rule.

Standards & conformity
  • DIN EN 901 · § 11 TrinkwV
  • DVGW W551
  • TrinkwV approval (Umweltbundesamt)
  • WHO-compliant
  • CE conformity
  • No change in taste

Typical entry points

Who the review is for

For facility management, building services and operators of industrial evaporative cooling systems. The review is particularly worthwhile if one of these points applies:

Elevated Legionella count

A finding exists and needs to be put in context.

Unstable operating values

Readings fluctuate or fail to hold the target range.

Biofilm in the circuit

Recurring loading despite treatment.

Gap in inspection or documentation

Records are incomplete or scattered.

System context

Why biofilm and operating regime belong together

Evaporative cooling generates aerosols; rising colony counts and Legionella findings usually arise where biofilm, nutrients, temperature and the operating regime come together. A one-off shock treatment addresses the symptoms. Hygiene only becomes durable once water condition, dosing and plant management are run as one system.

When factors combine

Biofilm · nutrients · temperature · operating regime

A one-off shock treatment addresses the symptoms.

Run as one system

Water condition · dosing · plant management

Durably stable hygiene, traceable in operation.

Method

Monitoring water condition, dosing and redox

Voigtländer generates anolyte on site and doses it into the cooling circuit under measurement control, via redox control, for example. Operating data is stored, so the plant's history remains traceable. This method does away with chlorine gas logistics and hazardous-substance storage; the specific risk assessment remains plant-specific.

Voigtländer three-chamber generator with control unit
Generation on site: three-chamber generator with control unit and cell block.
Measurement system of a Voigtländer plant
Measurement-led: the treatment condition is recorded and stored.

System overview

Closed control loop of cooling water hygiene

Inlet and water meter, brine tank, the three-chamber generator, anolyte tank, demand-led dosing, measurement and control: seven stages in 34 seconds. Press "Show me the process" to start the animated 3D diagram.

starts when the frame is in view

Modelled from the Voigtländer plant schematic of an anolyte system, in the drawing language of the home page. The cards show documented facts only, no invented figures.

Regulation

Placing the requirements of the 42. BImSchV

The ordinance requires operation according to the state of the art, internal operational inspections, laboratory testing for Legionella, a Betriebstagebuch (operating logbook) and graduated measures when findings occur. Monthly laboratory testing is not the blanket default; it arises, for example, after a confirmed exceedance of a Prüfwert (inspection value). The plant is notified via the KaVKA-Portal.

The "reference value 100" relates to the general colony count, not to Legionella. The binding assignment follows from the classification of the specific plant.

Inspection and action values by plant type, and the duties under the 42. BImSchV

Review sequence

How the operator path runs

  1. 1

    Classify the plant type

    Evaporative cooling system, wet separator or cooling tower.

  2. 2

    Internal operational inspection

    Check operation against the state of the art.

  3. 3

    Laboratory testing

    Testing for Legionella at the defined interval.

  4. 4

    Place the values

    Assess the finding against the inspection values for the plant type.

  5. 5

    Measures and records

    Graduated measures and keeping the Betriebstagebuch.

A sequence shown for orientation. The binding duties, intervals and deadlines depend on the classification of your specific plant; see Duties under the 42. BImSchV.

Reference

Application in a hospital cooling tower

The Healthcare/HVAC catalogue describes a plant at a German university hospital with continuous redox control and stored operating data. The application is described in Hydreatio's own case study as a cooling tower and HVAC reference; the site is not named until the operator releases it.

Performance figures remain bound to the specific project context and are not a general undertaking.

The objection

The central objection, answered honestly

Treatment does not replace the operator's duties: laboratory testing, the Betriebstagebuch, notification and the graduated measures remain the operator's responsibility. The technology supports plant management; it does not take its place.

Questions before the first call

What operators ask before a plant assessment

01What are the operator duties for evaporative cooling systems under Germany's 42. BImSchV?

Operators must run the plant according to the state of the art, carry out internal operational inspections and laboratory testing for Legionella, keep a Betriebstagebuch (operating logbook) and take graduated measures when findings occur. Notification of the plant is made via the KaVKA-Portal. Which inspections, intervals and values apply depends on how the plant is classified.

02What must be done if the action value for Legionella in a cooling tower is exceeded?

If the action value (Maßnahmenwert) is exceeded, the competent authority must be informed without delay; among other things, Legionella must be differentiated and tested further, and if confirmed, further measures to avert danger follow. Causes are investigated, technical or operational measures taken and steps recorded in the Betriebstagebuch. Details depend on plant category, value level and confirmation result; deadlines and notification routes are in the 42. BImSchV.

03How does the Voigtländer method support Legionella control in cooling towers?

The method supports Legionella control: anolyte is generated on site and dosed into the cooling circuit under measurement control, for example via redox control, and operating data is stored. Design is plant-specific. Hygiene only becomes durable once water condition, dosing and plant management run as one system; a one-off shock treatment addresses the symptoms. Laboratory testing, the Betriebstagebuch, notification and graduated measures stay with the operator.

04What is the difference between inspection values and the action value in the 42. BImSchV?

Inspection values (Prüfwert 1 and 2) are the lower levels: investigate the cause and tighten control. The action value (Maßnahmenwert) is the highest and, among other things, adds differentiation of Legionella, additional laboratory tests and, if confirmed, measures to avert danger. In CFU per 100 ml: 100, 1,000 and 10,000 for evaporative cooling systems and wet separators; 500, 5,000 and 50,000 for legally defined cooling towers.

05Which systems fall under the 42. BImSchV?

The 42. BImSchV covers evaporative cooling systems, cooling towers and wet separators in which water can be trickled, sprayed or otherwise brought into contact with the atmosphere. Many industrial recooling systems fall into the evaporative cooling system category even when called cooling towers in daily operation. The classification follows design, operation and scope of application, not the colloquial name, and determines the relevant inspection and laboratory values.

Last reviewed: October 2026

Next step

Request a cooling tower hygiene review

The entry point runs alongside the building hygiene assessment; the cooling technology is a targeted add-on. It helps to know the plant type, the operating regime, previous laboratory findings and the reason for the review.

  1. 1You describe the plant, the plant type and the reason.
  2. 2A specialist assesses your enquiry.
  3. 3We agree the documents with you.

Request a cooling tower hygiene review

Briefly describe the plant, the plant type and the reason. A few details are enough for a first contact.

We use your details to process your enquiry (Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR). Information on processing is set out in the privacy policy.

Your enquiry will be assessed by a specialist. The applicable duties depend on the classification of your specific plant.

Describe your water problem

In a few questions, the Smart Match places your situation and shows the most useful next testing step for your water system.

No obligationResult straight in the browser

Speak to our team directly

Prefer a conversation to a form? We will assess your situation and name the next testing step.

Get in touch ›

Send in a water analysis

Already have analysis results? Send them to us: we will review them and come back with a first assessment.

Send an analysis ›